"Coyote, Ugly: The Fields of Killing Coyote run red with cruelty in powerful documentary."
Phoenix New Times, September 7, 2000
by M.V. Moorhead
The title is
Killing Coyote,
and that's quite literally the subject. But as Hollywood's own
Wile E. has taught us, that's easier said than done.
The documentary, directed by Doug Hawes-Davis, is the chronicle
of a brutal and little-publicized "predator control"
policy toward the ubiquitous canines in the contemporary American
West. It focuses on the grim works of the Animal Damage Control
division of the U.S. Department of Agriculture on behalf of livestock
producers, before climaxing with a stomach-turning portrait of
the practice of "body count" hunting contests. As depicted
here, it's a tradition of slaughter (and, in some cases, grotesque
"scientific" torture) that would be comical in its ineffectiveness
if it weren't so appallingly cruel.
Except possibly for a few of the hunters who appear in it, this
is not a film anyone's likely to watch for pleasure, though it's
inevitably powerful. It's a coyote snuff movie, full of graphic,
all-but-unwatchable footage of the creatures whirling in death
jigs as they're shot by hunters or picked off from airplanes.
We see them struggling in paw-mangling leg-hold traps, and shut
up in government-run kennels as the subjects of contraception
experiments. Near the end, we're shown the results of a "body
count" contest in Wyoming, a killing field of coyotes that's
a hair-raising spectacle. Nor does the film sugar-coat the coyotes
own nature -- there's vivid footage of a coyote killing a sheep.
All the same, Hawes-Davis manages to keep the film from turning
into dreary and unproductive rhetoric. Within its harrowing visual
context, it still presents a range of viewpoints. Its frame is
the hearing last year in Flagstaff in which the Arizona Game and
Fish Commission passed a rule banning contest hunts for "predators,
fur-bearers or non-game mammals." The rule has not been enforced
-- it was later rejected by the Governor's Regulatory Review Council,
but comes up for a second vote on Tuesday, September 12.
Among those testifying are the usual suspects -- the new agey-looking
ladies spluttering about how much the hunts horrify them, and
the creepy rednecks and hunters asserting that it's their God-given
right to kill any damn thing they please any damn way they please.
Intercut with this are talking-head interviews. We meet ranchers
who try, with unconscious irony, to paint coyotes as romantic
villans who take pleasure in killing their sheep and cows. While
it's clear that Hawes-Davis isn't in sympathy with the hunters'
side of the issue, it's also clear that he developed some feeling
for them, and he gives them their due -- it's plain that many
of the hunters have a genuine, if psychotically expressed, fondness
for the creatures they stalk.
Among all of these factions are the dweeby biowonks, to whom falls
the duty of wearily explaining the rich irony: that the mass slaughter
of coyotes may actually be a factor in their population boom,
because it increases the number of litter survivors and also the
incidence of mating by eliminating alpha males from packs. It
also may increase the likelihood that coyotes will hunt sheep,
since larger litters require larger meals. In the same way, the
elimination of large predators such as wolves and cougars has
had the effect of spreading the coyote's range far to the east
of the Mississippi. As individuals, coyotes suffer horrendously
in
Killing Coyote, but it's also
clear that as a species, they aren't going anywhere anytime soon,
and they emerge as the beleaguered and deeply endearing heroes
of the movie.
These sentiments are echoed by the most charming human in the
film, an elderly soft-spoken Montana cattle rancher who remarks
that his accountant, the IRS and the Ford dealership are all higher
than the coyotes on the list of those who get his cows away from
him. "If they get any, they're probably entitled to them,"
he says.